Posts Tagged ‘Wellcome’

Tooth Transplant on Static TV

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

Teeth in the Eighteenth Century and the Tooth Transplant from Static TV on Vimeo.

Dear Friends,

Jon and I were very thankful for the feedback we received from various people involved in the Wellcome competition – and from various people not involved – and decided to take into consideration what we could without re-filming sections.  It is around 30 seconds longer to give it space to breathe a little in places and to provide proper credits.  We have changed a few of the shots that we didn’t think quite fitted, too.

Please, everyone, have a look! It’s the most recent film on the static tv website.  The second most recent film is the other film I made on transplant.

www.statictv.org

LitSciMed Event 2: 500 Words on the Japanese Tooth Sign

Friday, May 7th, 2010

toothSign

Dear Friends,

This post is to constitute my 500 word submission for the LitSciMed Event 2.   So, what have we got here?!

It’s a 19th Century Japanese sign announcing a doctor’s surgery.  I have been interested in the poetics of the object, here, rather than any ‘real’ history.  In other words, I have looked at the object only and associated it with other elements of Japanese culture that I know about.  Originally, I was going to look at the lock of King George III’s hair encased upstairs in the Wellcome Collection’s Medicine Man gallery but lots of what I wanted to write about was pre-empted when Simon Chaplin produced a lock of William Hunter’s hair for our group discussion.  So, I went for the above instead.  I wanted to look at the use of teeth in particular and speculate upon potential meanings the teeth might have.  I suppose my approach is taken from merely looking at the object – any ‘real’ history of it would probably expose my thinking as entirely untrue.  However, I think that practising some of this ‘free association’ can yield interesting results.   That they were, in this instance, meant to signify something to do with health and healing prompted me into thinking about the position of teeth in Japanese traditions.

I was thinking about the status of and the experience of them.  They fall out and grow back (once).  They are considered external to the body, yet pain from them marks a good proportion of one’s life.  They are central to health, yet once beneath medical men who would have no problem sticking an enema up someone’s backside but could never bring themselves to delve into a stinking mouth.  They are essential, yet extractable; they easily rot, yet are used as a last resort as the most durable items with which to identify a body; they are interior, yet exterior; at the margins of your body, they are disposable yet hold your mouth in shape.  Taking one’s tongue as a focus of sensation, one might explore the landscape of the mouth with it.  The teeth are the mouth’s furniture and, just as if something changes about a familiar room, if something changes about one’s teeth, it is noticed.  Any change to this landscape close to where you are said to be (that being in the head according to ‘Western’ thought) is in some sense unsettling.  This is why having a tooth removed or a filling put in makes one’s mouth feel alien for a while until it becomes usual.

I think that little bit of phenomenology is common no matter what your nationality, though I suppose teeth do indeed mean things to different people of different (or even the same) groups.  To this end, and considering the teeth as perhaps considered excrement of the body or in some other sense external, I wanted to bring to bear the Japanese concept of Kuyō, which has been described as is a Buddhist term referring to a ritual practice that is ‘at once a worship service, a formal apology and an expression of gratitude, an appeasement rite, and a funeral. [...]’ (Law 1997, 201-202).  For an inanimate object, that is.  La Fleur quotes from Wagatsuma:

The women pray that these needles may now enter into a deserved Buddhahood.  There in the temple or shrine they pass these through a block of bean-curd (tofu, an eminently soft substance).  In effect they say: ‘You needles have spent your lives doing hard work.  You unstintingly gave of yourself by again and again going through tough pieces of cotton cloth – even suffering in such labors [sic].  Now lie down on this mattress of bean-curd and take your rest.’ (quoted from Wagatsuma in La Fleur 1992, 144-145)

If the teeth can be considered as an inanimate object – or pseudo-inanimate object – then I think there might be some nice play between this particular concept of mortality being extended in that the many teeth dangling from the doctor’s sign may be said to have been laid to rest in a similar way to the needle in the quotation above.  Perhaps the teeth could then be interpreted as being remnants of others’ bodies the doctor has treated…

I suppose, if I were to conclude this little entry, I would say that I would need to look much deeper into Japanese medical traditions and this kind of signage in particular in order to draw any useful historical points.  However, as a poetic exercise (I suppose you could call it), and a means through which one might think about teeth, it is a fascinating object.

Event 2, Days 2 and 3: Kings’ College, the Foundling Museum, and the Hunterian Museum

Friday, April 2nd, 2010

Dear Friends,

I didn’t write this straight after the event… I am actually writing it in Manchester (well, Bolton, but, as a centre of race-riots, I don’t really like to say I’m from there!!).

On day 2, we went to the Foundling Museum, which was great as a museum.  I know that there has been quite a bit of heated discussion about the museum’s portrayal as a mainly philanthropic institution and others felt that there was very little discussion of objects.  I suppose I was just happy to be there and spend some time somewhere to which I would probably never have gone.  I don’t really have much more to say about the Foundling Museum, though the trade in babies motif is something I’m going to file in the back of my mind and pull out later on in my Ph.D.!

Now, Kings’ College I had mixed feelings about.  I felt Neil was a fantastic speaker and very engaging.  Retrospective diagnosis is something that I have no real interest in but it has heightened my sensitivity to other authors using it and has made me more critical of their work (since, I have noticed Roy Porter doing a fair bit of it!).  As for Brian’s talk, I’m afraid to say, I had a lot of trouble keeping up.  Again, it is something that I have no academic interest in but I generally get irritable when someone reads a presentation to me even if it’s something I am interested in!

The Hunterian Museum, on the other hand, was a magical place!!! I brought back the ‘Narrative Remains’ book and showed my Nan.  She said – along with the Wellcome Library’s ‘Cures and Curiosities’ – that she has never read a book before but she will read those ones! The museum must be doing something right there.  And I found the objects intriguing from an academic stand-point, too.  In a few weeks, I have to write about some part of the culture of collecting and I think that writing about those glass jars and their part in allowing body parts to be collected and viewed will be a great topic! Also, it’ll be a good way into writing about the body as a commodity in the 18th Century when I get to that part of my Ph.D.

Overall, I had a great time and got some really valuable thinking done! It was great to see everyone again and to meet some lovely new people.

To follow are my 500 words!

Who’s making a film for the Wellcome Film competition?!

Event 2, Day 1: The Wellcome Collection and Library

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

Dear Friends,

I am very pleased to be re-united with some familiar faces and to meet some new ones.  Again, this seems like a wonderful group and I’m sure that the next two days will be just as much fun and as useful as today.  I am going to take a slightly different approach to documenting these events.  Instead of attaching all of my pictures, I’m going to let Sharon put them where she sees fit.  I have noticed that I do not have much server space left on the LitSciMed server so I must restrict my ‘official’ documentation to text for now.  Hopefully, I’ll be able to do something more creative with the photographs (as well as pass them onto Sharon and anyone else who wants copies) at a later date but it’ll mean more faffing around than it did with the first event and I’m getting to a place where I can write after a much longer journey than up the stairs to the room in St Deiniols!

So, what happened today? Let us see!

We had some great sessions run by the Wellcome Collection team, at least three of whom recognised me from the library.  You see, I practically live in that library anyway, spending at least half of the week in there.  It’s my favourite place to work.  The other half of the week (when I’m not engaged in teaching or going to seminars et cetera, is spent in the British Library.  The BL is my second place to work – even though some of their security guards are ruffians! That said, even though I use the library extensively already, I discovered some useful things from Jenn Philips-Bacher: I always wondered what the ‘lightbox’ was on the Wellcome catalogue! Also, someone who I have only ever seen being quiet, spoke very well about some cabinet doors (William Schupbach.  Carol Reeves also gave a lovely talk about some ‘lies’ and gave us all some diaries.  I am the only one I know of with a 1940 diary.  I’m going to wait until the days of that year align with the days of the 1940 year and use a good quality diary! She also set up a competition that I hope others will enter (I certainly will!) to make a history of medicine movie: deadline is 1st June… I’m going to have a bash at that after Easter! Also, Ross McFarlane shepherded us though this adventure providing an expert introduction and the glue that stuck it all together.

So, what did I learn today? I think that’s a question that’s rather difficult to answer, if I’m not going to just write about the odd trick I’ve learned for the library catalogue.  You see, this session – indeed, this event – is about objects, using objects, and thinking about objects.  I’m going to have to do this extensively in my own Ph.D., I think, as I don’t want my writing to be an anthology.  Similarly, however, I’m not keen on simply applying theorists like many seem content to be doing.  I agree that they have a lot to offer but I don’t think theory is the be-all and end-all.  I remember a discussion on this website a few months ago where Jerome said that we were perhaps ‘post-theory’.  I think that’s largely true – at least, that is, we can operate within the framework of theories without refining theories being the crux of the work.  Anyway, the question of using objects is one that I’ve already paid a lot of attention to.  One thing that William mentioned that stuck with me, however, is that a painting is only 1mm or so of image and the rest is object (I’m paraphrasing!).  I like that and I think it will sit well with my thinking about the ‘it-narrative’ that I’m going to write a little about in the coming days.

I think I’ll be better placed to talk about objects and my thinking about them and their use in the next two days.  Today was more geared towards finding and using objects in a very general manner.

Contrary to St. Deiniols… the food in the hotel was awfully dry, expensive, and left me with a gaping spiritual hole…